NDAA: Spy Bill and Traitor Senators

Posted by on

NDAA: Spy Bill and Traitor Senators


Earlier today the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) was passed/renewed by the Senate. Within this Act was FISA 702, which was originally passed back in 2008. This allows the Intelligence Communities (N.S.A, C.IA, etc) to collect, analyze and share "foreign intelligence information" regarding National Security threats.

But legally speaking, it is perfectly legal for America's domestic Intelligence Agencies to receive information from foreign sources - maybe Britain or Israel - on American citizens; due to the gathering of data having been done outside of American jurisdiction. This is the effect of FISA 702; it essentially allows warrantless digital searches and seizures of Americans' private data.

Below is the lists of the Senators who voted 👇

Senators who voted "yes" for adding FISA 702 to the NDAA

Senators who voted "no" on adding FISA 702 to the NDAA renewal


Of the Senators who voted YES, these are the ones from New England
  1. Blumenthal (D- CT)
  2. Collins (R - ME)
  3. Hassan (D - NH)
  4. King (I - ME)
  5. Murphy (D -CT)
  6. Reed (D - RI)
  7. Shaheen (D - NH)
  8. Whitehouse (D - RI)
Of the Senators who voted No, these are the ones from New England
  1. Markey (D - MA)
  2. Sanders (I - VT)
  3. Warren (D -MA)
  4. Welch (D -VT)


Below is the list of Senators who voted on passing/rejecting the NDAA with the FISA 702 included 👇

Senators who voted YES on passing the NDAA with FISA 702 included


Senators who voted NO on the NDAA with FISA 702 included

Of the Senators who voted YES on passing the NDAA with FISA 702 included, below are those from New England 👇

  1. Collins (R -ME)
  2. Hassan (D -NH)
  3. King (I - ME)
  4. Murphy (D -CT)
  5. Reed (D - RI)
  6. Shaheen (D -NH)
  7. Whitehouse (D -RI)

Of the Senators who voted NO on passing the NDAA with FISA 702 included, below are those from New England 👇

  1. Markey (D - MA)
  2. Sanders (I -VT)
  3. Warren (D -MA)
  4. Welch (D - VT)


The NDAA and FISA is just one of many governmental programs/acts that goes against our 4th Amendment right.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shallows issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you'd like to contribute, please donate below or leave a comment. If you'd like to make a recurring monthly donation, fill out the contact form and put the amount (in $) you'd like to donate per month; an email will be sent to you shortly

XMR/Monero


Address: 881NwxXCxNtChXE4tFqXhEZDQxSxSkczqDyMsbGxaWpWhEV6u3yrZAnijnYwpZih6E4izk9b9JxbhFjpEgqw86UNTjLmveJ



Comments

Post a Comment